DocLex for advisors & auditors

More analysis capacity.
Same professional responsibility.

DocLex automates a large part of document review, evidence mapping and gap identification before the professional review — so specialist time can be spent where it creates the most value.

DocLex produces the analytical basis. Professional judgement, approval and any signed statement remain with the advisor or auditor.

Value for a professional firm

Reduce manual analysis work — without reducing professional control.

1

Capacity

Large document volumes can be reviewed and structured without a corresponding growth in specialist hours.

2

Consistency

The same requirement structure and process can be applied across clients and engagements.

3

Traceability

Findings are tied to documentation and regulatory basis, making the review easier to verify.

4

Focus

The advisor spends more time on assessment, dialogue and recommendations — less on manual compilation.

Test case · NIS2

31 documents in. One analytical basis out.

A fictitious NIS2 test case shows how DocLex can process a comprehensive document corpus into a structured compliance and gap-analysis report.

31 source documents
21 control areas
at most 9 clarification questions

The material included among other things

Information security policy, cyber risk register, incident response, business continuity, disaster recovery, backup/restore, asset register, access management, MFA, logging, vulnerability management, patching, change management, secure development, supplier management, penetration testing and internal audit.

Test status: The report is a test output on synthetic material and contains known errors and shortcomings. It is shown as an example of the analytical form — not as a finalised product output.
NIS2 Compliance
System security
Conflicting sources
Legal basis
NIS2 § 6 no. 5

DocLex finds among other things contradicting patch deadlines (14 vs 30 days), three critical vulnerabilities past the deadline, an emergency change without post-review and missing dependency scanning.

Recommended action
Set a single deadline, close or risk-accept the critical vulnerabilities, carry out the post-review and introduce dependency scanning.

Control & traceability

AI supports the analysis. The regulatory structure is controlled outside the language model.

DocLex is designed to make the analytical work verifiable and to reduce reliance on free generative assessments.

The model describes — the code decides

Status structure, legal list and central control points are owned by DocLex logic, not by the language model alone.

Regulatory provenance

The report's regulatory basis is linked to versioned EU and national sources and can be traced back to the basis used.

Documented ≠ stated

Facts from the documents are kept separate from information the customer provides in the clarification dialogue.

Professional review

DocLex produces the analytical basis. The responsible professional reviews and approves the final result.

DPIA · FRIA · NIS2

Same product engine — several professional uses.

Use DocLex as a production layer in front of advisory, review or statement work. No heavy implementation is needed to try its applicability on a concrete case.

Let the machine assemble the analytical basis. Let the professional spend time on the assessment.

Professional trial

Would you like to see DocLex on a concrete case?

We are happy to show the analysis flow, report output and how the regulatory and evidentiary trail is built.

Contact DocLex →